Everyone's making this whole big deal about the Israeli strike into Syria over the weekend. If America can go into other nations and attack terrorist camps, why can't Israel? It's not like we're going to be getting any cooperation from the Syrians, the Lebanese, or any of their Arab League brothers in the "War on Terror." We're talking about Syria, the nation that had an open border policy with the terrorist regime to its east. The nation that probably let Iraqi WMD's into their country for "sake keeping" [based on intel from several countries, not just America-which seems to be a bit faulty these days]. What's ironic is that Syria is complaining about acts of agression against a sovereign state. I forgot. Could someone please remind me who's in control of Lebanon right now? Take your time. Right, that's what I thought.
Despite anyone's concerns that Syria's next on our "Nations to Overthrow" list, they truly are a terrorist-supporting state. They've supported Hezbollah for decades. Last time I checked they were a terrorist group, correct? It's a known fact that Hamas and PIJ [as well as who knows how many more terrorist organizations] are based in Damascus. They, too, are terrorist organizations which would make Syria a haven for terrorists, right? So if the terrorist organizations order attacks on Israeli civilians within "Pre-67" Israel, wouldn't it be appropriate for Israel to retaliate against those that ordered the attack? Syria complains of Israeli aggression...isn't killing civilians in another sovereign state considered 'aggression'?