While I agree with the beginning of this op-ed in today's Times, namely that the real question regarding gay marriage of how it will affect society, is not being asked. However, I totally disagree with the author's explanation and think that his own answer (that it will weaken the institution of marriage and perhaps give adulterous spouses more wiggleroom) does not really get to the bottom of the issue. Maybe next week...
Sunday, February 29, 2004
In case you missed it...
- Perhaps from this Washington Post article we can u...
- You know an article is important when, the night b...
- More on SCOTUS justice Scalia's recent hunting tri...
- In light of the fact that Palestinians have been k...
- Mazel tov to NYTimes columnist, David Brooks, on h...
- Today's headlines: <<Blair Government Beset By UN...
- Some insight, from Ha'aretz into the "state of th...
- While I'd prefer not to quote Rush Limbaugh for an...
- Does the New York Times really think that an op-ed...
- Another Recess Appointment Ah, yes, I almost forg...
Jewish Bloggers
Join >>
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home